Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 9th September 2010

Dovesdale incinerator health concerns

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 July 2010
A HEALTH researcher has claimed that those living in close proximity to the proposed waste treatment facility, near Blackwood, could suffer huge health risks.
Michael Ryan (61) studied health statistics in areas of England and Wales which had waste disposal incinerators similar to that proposed at Dovesdale Farm.

A retired Environmental Agency civil engineer, Michael said: "There is little doubt that the data points to massive health implications in those living near them.

"You cannot get away from those facts. You can't take a chance with people's health like this.

"I have looked at 28 different incinerators across England and the results are always the same."

However, Scotgen spokesman Lloyd Brotherton moved to calm any concerns by stating that Scotgen would be using a gasification NOT an incineration process.

He said: "Unlike incineration the solid waste is itself not the fuel. Instead the solid waste is heated in an atmosphere where there is insufficient air to promote combustion.

"By taking those energy rich gases away from the solid waste and combusting them in a separate chamber we are using a gas as a fuel.

"The combustion of a gaseous fuel is more efficient than the
combustion of a solid fuel.

"The time, temperature and turbulence are all carefully designed into the combustion chamber ensuring a cleaner and more thermally efficient process."

For more on this story, pick up a copy of this week's Carluke and Lanark Gazette which is in the shops now.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 July 2010 4:12 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Carluke
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Michael Ryan,

Shrewsbury 29/07/2010 17:48:52
I've been appalled at some of the data I've examined at electoral ward level around incinerators and other industrial sources.

When I worked for the Environment Agency and its predecessor organisations, much of my work involved "flood defence".

If I'd declared that land subject to flooding wasn't a risk, I'd have soon been "caught out" after houses had been built. My colleagues and I used extensive data (when available) and sound engineering judgement (when no data available) when making comments to local authorities on whether or not houses or other developments should be permitted. I expected similar, rigorous and transparent standards in health-related issues such as waste disposal and have been both surprised and disappointed at the lack of frankness.

We're often told "this process is safe", but those who make the assertion seem reluctant, or unable to provide data to back-up the claim.

I'm glad I didn't fall asleep in the "John Snow/cholera" lecture in my final undergraduate year, but didn't ever dream I'd be copying his research methodology forty years later.

Kind regards,

Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think Scotland faces a serious threat from the effects of climate change?
Yes
No


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.